Transcript: Africa Commission Report: Media Briefing by President
Thabo Mbeki at Premos, Pretoria, Friday, 11 March 2005 Pres Mbeki: As
you can see, it [the Africa Commission Report] is quite a thick document reflecting
the volume of work, the amount of work that has been done by the Commissioners
in particular to identify the things that need to be done urgently to address
all of the challenges that we identified in NEPAD, the challenges that we addressed
in the G8 Africa Action Plan. I must say that I was very pleased indeed
that the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, took the initiative to set up the
Commission and I do hope that it will indeed serve the purpose for which it was
intended. To move all of these programmes that we have agreed about African development
- the NEPAD programme [and] the G8 Africa Action Plan - it will do what it was
intended to do, which was to ensure that both of those things, NEPAD [and the]
G8 Africa Action Plan, are actually translated into a concrete programme. As
you can see I got a letter from the British Prime Minister two days ago about
this, and he has asked that we should as urgently as possible study the report,
of cause we will focus on these matters that were already part of the programme
of action. But he said that could we also interact with all the G8 members to
make sure that by the time that the G8 Summit takes place, in July this year,
it is indeed able to take actual practical decisions on the matters that have
been raised. We have already kept in contact with a number of G8 leaders,
with Chancellor Schroder, with President Jacques Chirac, with President Bush,
of course Prime Minister Blair himself. We will be in contact with everybody else
as he indicates, really to try and encourage everybody to make sure that by the
time we meet again in July, this work is not wasted; that we use it to arrive
at these practical decisions that need to be taken to implement these programmes
for the development of the African continent. But I must say thank you
very much indeed to the Commissioners, it is 400 pages of very small print, you
can see that this print requires very thick glasses to read it so there is a lot
of work that is contained here. It must translate not into a lot of paper. It
must translate into really firm serious programmes of action to implement these
proposals that are in support of what has originally been decided. Thank you very
much. Journalist: There has just been some suggestion coming out
of the G7 Finance Minister's meeting in London. For example, America is not too
keen on some aspects and maybe you know, France has a different idea about agricultural
subsidies and Japan might have a different view about debt. Do you see the likelihood,
let us put it this way, how much agreement do you think is feasible at Glen Eagles
on these very, I think quite a vicious proposal? Pres Mbeki: Well
first of all, the thing I will bear in mind is that the existing decisions about
all of these matters that are here, whether it is debt questions or questions
that have got to do with financing, development, whether it is questions to do
with trade, questions to do with capacity building with regard to projects, proposals,
whether it is questions of peace and security and so on, there are existing decisions.
What this was intended to do, was to get into the detail of what needed to be
done to translate those existing decisions into practicality. Now, the
reason for the existing decisions is that there must be an increase in the finances
for development; the current situation is that you then have different proposals
about how that financing shall be done. What would be contained in this report
is the proposal put forward by the British Government some time ago for an international
financing facility. You have proposals that have been put forward by President
Jacques Chirac with regard to generating the finances for development. You have
the existing United States positions which have to do with the millennium challenge
account. Now our view as NEPAD was that you needed to combine all of these so
that you have one Africa Development Fund. Whether it would be possible
to have arrived at that point by the time we meet in July this year, is something
that would arise. We would see whether it happens during the course of the discussions.
But what is absolutely certain is that even if we do not arrive at that position
of a common fund, there will be increased funds that will come maybe from separate
pockets, if we have not been able to reach a point of a common fund. Nevertheless
the funds will come. For that matter, it will obviously be easier for everybody
if these funds were pooled and devoted to these programmes that have already been
agreed upon, it would be easier. But if we do not get to that point it
does not mean that the funds will be absent, they will then come from different
pockets to finance the development. So quite what would then happen in the end
at Glen Eagles, I do not know but as I say, the British Prime Minister in his
letter earlier this week said, 'Please engage all of us about this'; a process
that we had already started. My own sense is that everybody is very keen
to achieve actual measurable programmes. So I think that we will come out with
the practical decisions that we need. End Issued by The Presidency
on 11 March 2005.
|