Addressing the Backlash Against Globalisation,
a Southern Perspective of the Problem - Remarks at the
World Economic Forum, Davos 28 January 2001
1. In order to develop a response to the current backlash
against globalisation we need to be clear on what we
mean by globalisation and understand the reasons for
the backlash against it.
2. By globalisation, which we see as an evolving and
ongoing historical process, we mean the integration
of national systems of production and finance. It is
driven by policies of liberalisation in trade and finance.
It is embodied in an ensemble of international relations
and institutions, at the apex of which are the multi-national
corporations, multi-lateral trading and financial institutions
like the IMF, the World Bank and the World Trading Organisations
(WTO). Faster globalisation is reflected in the incredible
growth in the size of cross-border flows of goods, services
and capital.
3. The impact of globalisation is extremely uneven,
both within and between nations. It implies rising inequalities
within countries (because of the shift in labour demand);
it leads to greater polarisation across countries (e.g.
R & D, knowledge production remain concentrated
in a small body of already industrialised countries
and tends to reproduce their competitive advantages);
and has resulted to greater vulnerability to macro-economic
shocks (developing countries seem to be especially vulnerable)
that lower growth and employment rates resulting in
widening the gap with developed countries.
4. The concern of countries of the South is largely
a response to this structural divide between the developed
and developing countries and as a result globalisation
is -
Perceived to be a system (meaning the institutions
that typify it) in which the strong countries/nations
advance their national interests to the detriment of
the weak nations, especially in the area of trade;
Accused for having led to the worsening the conditions
of life of the marginalized. It is blamed for the deep
structural poverty in which half the world's population
live on less than $2 per day and a fifth on less than
$1;
Blamed for the untenable debt situation that has risen
in many of the low income developing countries;
Blamed for the periodic financial crises that spread
with great ferocity and seem to affect more seriously,
developing countries like the recent Asian contagion;
and
Said to have led to the profound fissure between economic
inclusion and social exclusion that has emerged within
and between nations.
5. The choice for countries of the South is not whether
to engage with globalisation or not, but how to engage
with it. It is essential for governments and people
to engage with the process critically, to re-shape and
re-direct its impact. The objective must be to enhance
citizens' incorporation and access to the benefits of
globalisation, while minimising polarisation and social
exclusion, and mitigating these effects when and where
they do occur.
6. There is also a concern that that the WTO (seen
to be one of the key institution of globalisation) and
industrialised countries are very susceptible to pressure
from protectionist groupings like organised labour,
the agricultural lobbies and manufacturers involved
in the "grandfather" industries (steel, textiles
and clothing).
7. In order to address the backlash there are a number
of imperatives that we need to address. These are now
briefly dealt with.
8. The first key challenge is the reform of international
financial and trading institutions to take on board
the concerns of the countries of the South. For example
in regards to the WTO there is a need to re-examine
their rules (governing intellectual property rights,
dumping and countervailing measures, subsidies, etc.);
the agreements governing market access may need to be
renegotiated so as to benefit both developing countries
and developed (perhaps they need to favour developing
countries!); and the structures of governance require
reform to give greater weight to the concerns of the
countries of the South. In a sense this would lay a
basis to address the profound imbalances in the structure
of the global economy. In this regard we think the delay
in restarting the Millennium Round of the WTO after
the Seattle debacle is unnecessary and unfortunate!
9. Another challenge is that Governments of developed
countries need to do more to expand access to their
markets for developing countries' products by lowering
tariff exemptions and also providing exemptions from
the many non- tariff barriers. In this regard the developed
countries need to provide support to developing countries
to comply with their sanitary and phyto-sanitary measures
governing their imports.
10. Another important challenge is how to ensure greater
mobilisation of resources for development in countries
of the South. Here there are two matters that require
attention.
11. The first of these relate to the expansion of the
Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative so
as to include more countries and a larger share of countries'
debt. Debt relief should be granted more quickly and
should be tied to development targets and outcomes in
relation to poverty reduction, reform of institutions
of governance.
12. The second relates to increasing the rate of flow
of (private) foreign direct investments (FDI) to developing
countries, especially to Africa (Net FDI inflows to
Sub-Saharan Africa averaged less than 0.7% annually
in the 1990s, compared with an average for all developing
countries of over 1.2%).
13. Clearly to increase the flow of such foreign savings
(as well savings of Africa's private investors, many
of whom also prefer to hold their wealth outside the
continent!) would require developing countries to lower
risk perceptions of potential portfolio and direct investors,
by improving credibility of public financial authorities
and the soundness of public and private financial institutions.
14. Finally, there is a need for a renewed commitment
to partnership between the international social partners
that entails a shared responsibility to eradicate poverty,
social exclusion and marginalisation. On the part of
developing countries this means a commitment to create
conditions of peace, stability and good governance.
Thank you.
|